From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calderon v. Affirm, Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 19, 2024
2:24-cv-08799-RGK-MAAx (C.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-08799-RGK-MAAx

12-19-2024

Edgar Calderon v. Affirm, Inc. et al


PRESENT THE HONORABLE R. GARY KLAUSNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

The Order to Show Cause [18] issued on November 14, 2024 is discharged. The Court issues the following:

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 4(m). Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 12(a)(1).

In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing by December 26, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to certain defendant/s.

Alternatively, the Court will consider the following a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause:

Alternative Response

Response Due Date

As to Defendant/s:

X

Response to the operative Complaint

12/23/2024

Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

X

If defendant fails to respond on the date above, Plaintiff's application for entry of default by clerk pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

12/26/2024

Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

If a satisfactory response is not timely filed, the matter or the listed defendants will be dismissed for lack of prosecution. A stipulation to extend dates or a notice of settlement do not constitute a proper response to this order.

Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions including dismissal of certain parties and/or the entire action for lack of prosecution without further warning.

Plaintiff to serve this order on any non-appearing defendant/s who have been formally served.


Summaries of

Calderon v. Affirm, Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 19, 2024
2:24-cv-08799-RGK-MAAx (C.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2024)
Case details for

Calderon v. Affirm, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Edgar Calderon v. Affirm, Inc. et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 19, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-08799-RGK-MAAx (C.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2024)