From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calderon-Cardoza v. Garland

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 17, 2023
No. 22-1725 (4th Cir. Aug. 17, 2023)

Opinion

22-1725

08-17-2023

SARAHI ALEJANDRA CALDERON-CARDOZA; C.J.M.C., Petitioners, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.

Rebekah G. Grafton, FAY GRAFTON NUNEZ, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Petitioners. Brian Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Cindy S. Ferrier, Assistant Director, Tracie N. Jones, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: March 14, 2023

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

ON BRIEF:

Rebekah G. Grafton, FAY GRAFTON NUNEZ, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Petitioners.

Brian Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Cindy S. Ferrier, Assistant Director, Tracie N. Jones, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Sarahi Alejandra Calderon-Cardoza and her minor child, natives and citizens of Honduras, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing Calderon-Cardoza's appeal from the Immigration Judge's denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re Calderon-Cardoza (B.I.A. June 21, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

Calderon-Cardoza v. Garland

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 17, 2023
No. 22-1725 (4th Cir. Aug. 17, 2023)
Case details for

Calderon-Cardoza v. Garland

Case Details

Full title:SARAHI ALEJANDRA CALDERON-CARDOZA; C.J.M.C., Petitioners, v. MERRICK B…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 17, 2023

Citations

No. 22-1725 (4th Cir. Aug. 17, 2023)