From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calderaro v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 7, 2011
CIV S-10-0911 GGH (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2011)

Opinion

CIV S-10-0911 GGH.

February 7, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff filed her complaint on April 15, 2010; service was executed upon defendant on September 1, 2010. On November 30, 2010, defendant filed with this court a motion for summary judgment and/or to dismiss. Although defendant did not serve the motion on plaintiff, plaintiff's counsel was electronically served with the motion. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to the motion.

ACCORDINGLY, plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing within fourteen days of the filed date of this order why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Failure totimely file the required writing will result in a recommendation that the case be dismissed.

As both parties have not consented to proceed before the magistrate judge, the Clerk shall assign a district judge to the case in addition to the undersigned.

Dated: February 7, 2011


Summaries of

Calderaro v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 7, 2011
CIV S-10-0911 GGH (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Calderaro v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:VIRGINIA CALDERARO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 7, 2011

Citations

CIV S-10-0911 GGH (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2011)