Opinion
19-cv-11382 (LJL)
07-18-2022
EVELINA CALCANO on behalf of herself and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. SCHOTT NYC CORP., Defendant.
ORDER
LEWIS J. LIMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
The Court stayed this case pending a decision by the Second Circuit on appeals before it concerning the same issues and arguments raised in this case. Dkt. No. 22. At the time, Defendant had filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim and lack of standing. Dkt. No. 19. No answer had been filed.
On June 2, 2022, the Second Circuit issued a decision in the consolidated appeal Calcano v. Swarovski N. Am. Ltd, No. 20-1552, 2022 WL 1788305 (2d Cir. June 2, 2022). In Calcano, the Second Circuit held that plaintiffs' “conclusory claims” that they intended to return to Defendants' stores were not sufficient to allege standing. Id. at *6. The mandate has now issued. See Calcano v. Swarovski, No. 19-cv-10536-GHW, at ECF. No. 30.
It is hereby ORDERED that within 30 days of this Order, Plaintiff shall submit a letter indicating whether she intends to amend her complaint in light of the Second Circuit's decision in Calcano or whether she will stand on her original complaint. If Plaintiff intends to amend her complaint, she shall have 45 days after the issuance of this Order to do so. In the event that Plaintiff amends her complaint, Defendant may either move against the amended complaint or may answer. In the event Plaintiff does not amend her complaint, Defendant must indicate- within 14 days of Plaintiff informing the Court that she does not wish to amend or after her time for doing so has run-whether it wishes to renew the motion to dismiss denied without prejudice at Dkt. No. 22 or answer.
The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to lift the stay in this case.
SO ORDERED.