From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calcano v. Aero AG Holdings, LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 15, 2022
19 Civ. 10056 (JPC) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 15, 2022)

Opinion

19 Civ. 10056 (JPC)

06-15-2022

MARCOS CALCANO, Plaintiff, v. AERO AG HOLDINGS, LLC, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

JOHN P. CRONAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement in this case. Dkt. 37. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs, but without prejudice to restoring the action to the Court's calendar, provided the application to restore the action is made within forty-five days of this Order in the event the settlement agreement is not completed and executed. Any such application filed after forty-five days from the date of this Order may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court by the deadline to reopen to be “so ordered” by the Court. Pursuant to 3.F of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record. Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are canceled. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Calcano v. Aero AG Holdings, LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 15, 2022
19 Civ. 10056 (JPC) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Calcano v. Aero AG Holdings, LLC

Case Details

Full title:MARCOS CALCANO, Plaintiff, v. AERO AG HOLDINGS, LLC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 15, 2022

Citations

19 Civ. 10056 (JPC) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 15, 2022)