From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp. v. Reed

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Eighth Division
Oct 14, 2009
No. B213060 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 14, 2009)

Opinion


CAL-WESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. BARRY REED, Defendant and Appellant, GEORGE HALIMI, Defendant and Respondent. B213060 California Court of Appeal, Second District, Eighth Division October 14, 2009

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. TS007925

IT IS ORDERED that the opinion filed in the above-captioned matter on September 22, 2009, be modified as follows:

1. On page 8, insert a footnote “2” after the last sentence ending with “against Halimi”, and before the heading “Disposition”:

“Nothing we have said in this opinion affects Reed’s promissory note to Halimi, which, the record suggests, Reed concedes is owed to Halimi. Nor does anything in this opinion affect Halimi’s claim that Reed still owes unpaid legal fees to Halimi. The merits of those issues simply must be resolved outside of the context of the Civil Code section 2924j proceeding.”

This modification effects no change in the judgment.

The petition for rehearing filed by Respondent on October 5, 2009, is denied.

RUBIN, Acting P. J. FLIER, J. BIGELOW, J.


Summaries of

Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp. v. Reed

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Eighth Division
Oct 14, 2009
No. B213060 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 14, 2009)
Case details for

Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp. v. Reed

Case Details

Full title:CAL-WESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. BARRY REED, Defendant…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Second District, Eighth Division

Date published: Oct 14, 2009

Citations

No. B213060 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 14, 2009)