Opinion
S269212
07-28-2021
CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION v. AETNA HEALTH OF CALIFORNIA
The requests to appear as counsel pro hac vice are granted.
The petition for review is granted.
Pending review, the opinion of the Court of Appeal, which is currently published at 63 Cal.App.5th 660, 278 Cal.Rptr.3d 302, may be cited, not only for its persuasive value, but also for the limited purpose of establishing the existence of a conflict in authority that would in turn allow trial courts to exercise discretion under Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 450, 456, 20 Cal.Rptr. 321, 369 P.2d 937, to choose between sides of any such conflict. (See Standing Order Exercising Authority Under California Rules of Court, Rule 8.1115(e)(3), Upon Grant of Review or Transfer of a Matter with an Underlying Published Court of Appeal Opinion, Administrative Order 2021-04-21; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(e)(3) and corresponding Comment, par. 2.)
The request for an order directing depublication of the opinion is denied.
Corrigan, J., was absent and did not participate.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Liu, Cuéllar, Kruger, Groban and Jenkins, JJ.