From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cajamarca v. Interconex, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 28, 2004
8 A.D.3d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-04851.

Decided June 28, 2004.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered April 21, 2003, which denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Brand, Brand Burke, New York, N.Y. (Brett J. Nomberg of counsel), for appellants.

Michael Harris (Rivkin Radler, LLP, Uniondale, N.Y. [Evan H. Krinick, Cheryl F. Korman, and Merril S. Biscone] of counsel), for respondent.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., DAVID S. RITTER, BARRY A. COZIER, PETER B. SKELOS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff Efrain Cajamarca (hereinafter the injured plaintiff) allegedly sustained injuries when he fell from a scaffold while working at the defendant's property. The plaintiffs contend that the defendant violated Labor Law § 240(1) by failing to provide the injured plaintiff with proper protection.

To prevail on a cause of action under Labor Law § 240(1), a party must establish a violation of the statute, and that such violation was a proximate cause of his or her injuries ( see Tylman v. School Constr. Auth., 3 A.D.3d 488; Aslam v. Weiss, 308 A.D.2d 426). The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment since there is an issue of fact as to how the accident occurred ( see Aslam v. Weiss, supra).

The plaintiffs' remaining contention is without merit.

PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, COZIER and SKELOS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cajamarca v. Interconex, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 28, 2004
8 A.D.3d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Cajamarca v. Interconex, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EFRAIN CAJAMARCA, ET AL., appellants, v. INTERCONEX, INC., respondent (and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 28, 2004

Citations

8 A.D.3d 602 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
778 N.Y.S.2d 911

Citing Cases

Singh v. Six Ten Man

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the defendant…

Guaman v. Ginestri

The defendant Antonio Ginestri testified at an examination before trial, in substance, that the plaintiff…