From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caivano v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 10, 1973
276 So. 2d 245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

Summary

holding that though Caivano was convicted of both possession of cocaine and sale of cocaine, he should have only received one sentence for the highest offense charged since the offenses were facets of the same transaction

Summary of this case from Buggs v. State

Opinion

No. 72-505.

February 14, 1973. Rehearing Denied May 10, 1973.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Collier County, Charles R. Holley, J.

Kenneth R. Mikos, of Friedrich, Kersten Blackwell, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corces, Jr., and Richard C. Booth, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Appellant Caivano was charged in a two-count information with (1) possession of cocaine and (2) sale of cocaine on April 20, 1971. He was convicted of both charges and sentences of three years for each conviction were imposed by the trial judge to be served concurrently. The cocaine he was charged with possessing was the cocaine he was charged with selling. Caivano was therefore charged and convicted of two facets or phases of the same transaction. Only one sentence should have been imposed, and that for the highest offense charged. Yost v. State, Fla.App. 1971, 243 So.2d 469; Martin v. State, Fla.App. 1971, 251 So.2d 283; Brown v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 264 So.2d 28; Jones v. State, Fla. App. 1972, 265 So.2d 514.

We have examined the other points raised on appeal and find them to be without merit.

The judgment is affirmed, but the sentences are vacated and the cause is remanded with directions that appellant be presented to the trial court and properly sentenced in accordance herewith.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part with directions.

MANN, C.J., and LILES, J., concur.


Summaries of

Caivano v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 10, 1973
276 So. 2d 245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

holding that though Caivano was convicted of both possession of cocaine and sale of cocaine, he should have only received one sentence for the highest offense charged since the offenses were facets of the same transaction

Summary of this case from Buggs v. State
Case details for

Caivano v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT CAIVANO, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 10, 1973

Citations

276 So. 2d 245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

Citing Cases

Wright v. State

Because the defendant was convicted of two facets or phases of the same transaction, he could only be…

State v. Caivano

" The cause was remanded with directions that Caivano be presented to the trial court and properly sentenced…