From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caito v. Penland

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 5, 1985
476 So. 2d 745 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84-2535.

October 2, 1985. Rehearings Denied November 5, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Bobby Gunther, Judge.

H.T. Maloney of Patterson Maloney, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellant.

Harris K. Solomon of Brinkley, McNerney Morgan, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellee.


This is an appeal by the husband from a dissolution of marriage judgment.

We affirm the award of permanent periodic alimony to the wife upon authority of Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980) and Goss v. Goss, 400 So.2d 518 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

It appearing without question that the trial court, by reason of oversight, failed to determine the respective rights of the parties to a jointly owned money market account, we remand the cause with instructions to make such determination.

We affirm the judgment and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.

HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Caito v. Penland

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 5, 1985
476 So. 2d 745 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Caito v. Penland

Case Details

Full title:JOHN MICHAEL CAITO, APPELLANT, v. TONI L. PENLAND, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 5, 1985

Citations

476 So. 2d 745 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)