From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cain v. Caruso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Mar 6, 2012
Case No. 2:10-CV-77 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-CV-77

03-06-2012

DERRICK D. CAIN #256881, Plaintiff, v. P. CARUSO, et al., Defendants.


Hon. Gordon J. Quist


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action on January 31, 2012. The Report and Recommendation was served on Plaintiff via United States mail the same date. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed January 31, 2012, is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 63) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is granted with regard to: (1) Plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief; (2) Plaintiff's claim for damages under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1; and (3) Plaintiff's First Amendment claim against Defendants Barney, Downing, and Gerth. The motion is denied with regard to: (1) Plaintiff's First Amendment claims against Defendants Tribley, Warr, Beth Smith, Terri Smith, Burke, and Gerard; and (2) Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendant Reynolds.

____________

GORDON J. QUIST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cain v. Caruso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Mar 6, 2012
Case No. 2:10-CV-77 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Cain v. Caruso

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK D. CAIN #256881, Plaintiff, v. P. CARUSO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 6, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:10-CV-77 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 6, 2012)