From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cain v. Caruso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Aug 13, 2012
Case No. 2:10-CV-77 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 13, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-CV-77

08-13-2012

DERRICK D. CAIN #256881, Plaintiff, v. P. CARUSO, et al., Defendants.


Hon. Gordon J. Quist


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action on July 18, 2012. The Report and Recommendation was served on Plaintiff via United States mail the same date. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed July 18, 2012, is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants are awarded costs against Plaintiff in the amount of $615.10 for failing to attend his deposition.

This case is concluded.

______________

GORDON J. QUIST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cain v. Caruso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Aug 13, 2012
Case No. 2:10-CV-77 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Cain v. Caruso

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK D. CAIN #256881, Plaintiff, v. P. CARUSO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 13, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:10-CV-77 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 13, 2012)