From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caico v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 9, 2006
No. CIV S-02-1608 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-02-1608 MCE GGH P.

August 9, 2006


ORDER


On June 6, 2006, the court recommended that defendant Nun be dismissed. On June 27, 2006, plaintiff filed a response to the findings and recommendations. In this pleading, plaintiff requests that defendant Nun be dismissed. The court construes this as a request to voluntarily dismiss defendant Nun.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The June 6, 2006, findings and recommendations are vacated;

2. Plaintiff's request to dismiss defendant Nun is granted; defendant Nun is dismissed. Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a).


Summaries of

Caico v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 9, 2006
No. CIV S-02-1608 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2006)
Case details for

Caico v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:JAMES V. CAICO, Plaintiff, v. D.L. RUNNELS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 9, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-02-1608 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2006)