From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caiby v. Haidle

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Jul 27, 2022
CIVIL 3:18-cv-1120 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 27, 2022)

Opinion

CIVIL 3:18-cv-1120

07-27-2022

ANTHONY V. CAIBY, Plaintiff v. WARDEN GARY HAIDLE, et al., Defendants


ORDER

Robbert D. Mariani, United States District Judge

AND NOW, this 27th day of July, 2022, upon consideration of the County Defendants' motion (Doc. 82) for summary judgment, and the parties' respective briefs in support of and in opposition to said motion, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The motion (Doc. 82) is GRANTED.

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of Defendants Gary Haidle, Joseph McCoy, and Monroe County, and against Plaintiff.

3. The action against John and Jane Doe is DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See FED. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

4. Any appeal from this Order is DEEMED frivolous and not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).


Summaries of

Caiby v. Haidle

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Jul 27, 2022
CIVIL 3:18-cv-1120 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Caiby v. Haidle

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY V. CAIBY, Plaintiff v. WARDEN GARY HAIDLE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 27, 2022

Citations

CIVIL 3:18-cv-1120 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 27, 2022)