From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cai v. Garland

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 9, 2023
No. 21-1875 (4th Cir. Jun. 9, 2023)

Opinion

21-1875

06-09-2023

KANGHUA CAI, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.

Thomas V. Massucci, LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS V. MASSUCCI, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Brian Boynton, Acting Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Senior Litigation Counsel, Giovanni B. Di Maggio, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: September 21, 2022

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

ON BRIEF:

Thomas V. Massucci, LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS V. MASSUCCI, New York, New York, for Petitioner.

Brian Boynton, Acting Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Senior Litigation Counsel, Giovanni B. Di Maggio, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING, Circuit Judge, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Kanghua Cai, a native and citizen of the People's Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge's decision denying his applications for asylum and withholding of removal and finding that he filed a frivolous asylum application. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re Cai (B.I.A. July 28, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

Cai v. Garland

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 9, 2023
No. 21-1875 (4th Cir. Jun. 9, 2023)
Case details for

Cai v. Garland

Case Details

Full title:KANGHUA CAI, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 9, 2023

Citations

No. 21-1875 (4th Cir. Jun. 9, 2023)