From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cahill v. Delaware and Hudson Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1927
219 App. Div. 843 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

March, 1927.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Saratoga County.


There was evidence on which a jury could have found that the defendant was negligent. The vital question in the case is whether or not the deceased was guilty of contributory negligence. This presented a question of fact for the jury and not a question of law for the court. Van Kirk, Acting P.J., Hinman, McCann, Davis and Whitmyer, JJ., concur. Judgment reversed on the law and facts, and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.


Summaries of

Cahill v. Delaware and Hudson Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1927
219 App. Div. 843 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

Cahill v. Delaware and Hudson Company

Case Details

Full title:JAMES CAHILL, as Administrator, etc., of MARGARET CUDNEY, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1927

Citations

219 App. Div. 843 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)