From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cagle v. Gravlin

United States District Court, N.D. New York
May 25, 2010
9:09-CV-0648 (FJS/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. May. 25, 2010)

Opinion

9:09-CV-0648 (FJS/GHL).

May 25, 2010

MICHAEL CAGLE, Plaintiff, pro se, 09-CV-0648, Sullivan Correctional Facility, Fallsburg, NY.

Krista A. Rock, Esq., HON. ANDREW M. CUOMO, Attorney General of the State of New York, Attorney for Defendants, The Capitol, Albany, New York.


DECISION AND ORDER


Presently before the Court is Magistrate Judge George H. Lowe's April 29, 2010 Report-Recommendation in which he recommends the defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Court, having reviewed the Report-Recommendation and the entire file in this matter and no objections to said Report-Recommendation having been filed, hereby

ORDERS that the Report-Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge George H. Lowe on April 29, 2010 is, for the reasons stated therein, accepted in it entirety; and the Court further

ORDERS that Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; and the Court further

ORDERS that the following claims are dismissed with prejudice: (1) all claims against Defendants in their official capacities; (2) all claims against Defendants Van Orgrum and Bonds; (3) the claim that Defendants retaliated against Plaintiff; and (4) any claim that Defendants verbally harassed Plaintiff; and the Court further

ORDERS that the following claims are dismissed without prejudice: (1) the claim that Defendants violated Plaintiff's right of access to the courts; and (2) the claim that Defendants subjected Plaintiff to unconstitutional conditions of confinement by denying him recreation; and the Court further

ORDERS that Defendants Gravlin, Demarse, Lira, Trombly, Otis and Belleinier shall file and serve an answer to Plaintiff's conditions of confinement claim regarding his exposure to feces in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cagle v. Gravlin

United States District Court, N.D. New York
May 25, 2010
9:09-CV-0648 (FJS/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. May. 25, 2010)
Case details for

Cagle v. Gravlin

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL CAGLE, Plaintiff, v. GRAVLIN, DEMARSE, VAN ORGRUM, BONDS, LIRA…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: May 25, 2010

Citations

9:09-CV-0648 (FJS/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. May. 25, 2010)