From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cadlerock Joint Venture, L.P. v. Prado

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Oct 7, 2008
07-CV-1207 (JS) (WDW) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 7, 2008)

Opinion

07-CV-1207 (JS) (WDW).

October 7, 2008

For Plaintiff: Jack Hassid, Esq. New York, NY.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Upon review of the Report and Recommendation ("Report") of Magistrate Judge William D. Wall issued September 3, 2008, to which no party has objected, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report in its entirety.

Pursuant to Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure any objections to the Report were to be filed with the Clerk of the Court within ten days of service of the Report. The time for filing objections has expired and no Party has objected. Accordingly, all objections are hereby deemed to have been waived.

The Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety and ORDERS that damages be awarded totaling $247,134.20, plus additional per diem interest of $31.78 from September 1, 2008 until the date of entry of judgment.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cadlerock Joint Venture, L.P. v. Prado

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Oct 7, 2008
07-CV-1207 (JS) (WDW) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 7, 2008)
Case details for

Cadlerock Joint Venture, L.P. v. Prado

Case Details

Full title:CADLEROCK JOINT VENTURE, L.P., Plaintiff, v. ALFREDO PRADO and JOHN DOE #1…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Oct 7, 2008

Citations

07-CV-1207 (JS) (WDW) (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 7, 2008)

Citing Cases

MORRIS OKUN, INC. v. ROSITO

"Entry of a default judgment is appropriate when the `adversary process has been halted because of an…

KX Tech LLC v. Dilmen LLC

" (collecting cases)), report and recommendation adopted, 2014 WL 4437307 (Sept. 9, 2014); Cadlerock Joint…