From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cade v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jun 28, 2013
116 So. 3d 613 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 5D13–892.

2013-06-28

Jessie J. CADE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, Judge. Jessie J. Cade, Clermont, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, Judge.
Jessie J. Cade, Clermont, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Robertson v. State, 829 So.2d 901, 906–07 (Fla.2002) (stating that tipsy coachman doctrine allows an appellate court to affirm a ruling by the trial court that reached the right result, but for the wrong reason).

ORFINGER, C.J., PALMER and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cade v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jun 28, 2013
116 So. 3d 613 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Cade v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jessie J. CADE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Jun 28, 2013

Citations

116 So. 3d 613 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Citing Cases

Conley v. State

See Robertson v. State, 829 So.2d 901, 96 (Fla. 2002) ("This longstanding principle of appellate law,…