From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cade v. Burson

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 18, 1966
146 S.E.2d 761 (Ga. 1966)

Opinion

23303.

SUBMITTED JANUARY 10, 1966.

DECIDED JANUARY 18, 1966.

Appellate procedure. Baldwin Superior Court. Before Judge Carpenter.

Robert L. Cade, pro se.

Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Peyton S. Hawes, Jr., Alfred L. Evans, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.


R. H. Burson, the appellee, contends that the appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the enumeration of errors was not filed in this court within the time required by the law (Secs. 13 and 14 of the Appellate Practice Act; Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 29-30 and 240, 242-244; Code Ann. §§ 6-809, 6-810) and Rule 20 of this court. The record discloses that this appeal was docketed in this court on November 29, 1965, and the enumeration of errors was filed on December 21, 1965, seven days after the last day on which it could have been filed. The enumeration of errors not being timely filed, under the rulings in Stanford v. Evans, Reed Williams, 221 Ga. 331, 332 ( 145 S.E.2d 504), Yost v. Gunby, 221 Ga. 552 ( 145 S.E.2d 575), and Undercofler v. McLennan, 221 Ga. 613 ( 146 S.E.2d 635), we hereby dismiss the appeal.

Appeal dismissed. All the Justices concur.

SUBMITTED JANUARY 10, 1966 — DECIDED JANUARY 18, 1966.


Summaries of

Cade v. Burson

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 18, 1966
146 S.E.2d 761 (Ga. 1966)
Case details for

Cade v. Burson

Case Details

Full title:CADE v. BURSON, Director, et al

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Jan 18, 1966

Citations

146 S.E.2d 761 (Ga. 1966)
146 S.E.2d 761

Citing Cases

Gardner v. State

Not having been filed within the time required by rule of this court, the appeal is hereby dismissed. Brackin…

Ewing v. Whitehead

The late filing of an enumeration of errors is ground for dismissal in the absence of a showing of…