From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caddell v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 18, 2014
14-3482 RS (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2014)

Opinion

          ARNOLD & PORTER LLP, MAURICE A. LEITER, Los Angeles, California.

          ARNOLD & PORTER LLP, MICHAEL J. BAKER, SHARON D. MAYO, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Defendant Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.

          Joshua C. Ezrin, AUDET & PARTNERS, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Daniel C. Burke, PARKER WAICHMAN LLP, Port Washington, New York, Attorney for Plaintiffs.


          JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY LITIGATION PENDING TRANSFER TO THE PLAVIX® MDL

          RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

         This Joint Stipulation is made by and between Plaintiffs in Caddell et al. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al., No. CV-14-3482 RS (N.D. Cal.), and Defendant Bristol-Myers Squibb Company ("BMS") (collectively "the Parties"), by and through the undersigned counsel of record, with reference to the following facts:

         1. WHEREAS, on February 12, 2013, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") established a multidistrict Plavix® litigation in the District of New Jersey, assigned to Judge Freda Wolfson;

         2. WHEREAS, on July 31, 2014, Plaintiffs filed the Caddell action in the Superior Court of California, San Francisco County;

         3. WHEREAS, on August 1, 2014, the Caddell action was removed to this Court by Defendant BMS;

         4. WHEREAS, on August 12, 2014, Defendant BMS tagged this case for transfer to the Plavix® MDL and anticipates that the JPML will issue a conditional transfer order for this case soon; and

         5. WHEREAS, the parties agree that the Caddell action should be stayed pending its anticipated transfer to the Plavix® MDL in the District of New Jersey.

         THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the Court's approval, that the Caddell action should be stayed pending its anticipated transfer to the Plavix® MDL in the District of New Jersey.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Caddell v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 18, 2014
14-3482 RS (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2014)
Case details for

Caddell v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

Case Details

Full title:JENNIE CADDELL et al., Plaintiff, v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Aug 18, 2014

Citations

14-3482 RS (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2014)