From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cacho v. Tennis

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 27, 2009
CIVIL ACTION, NO. 08-05722 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 27, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION, NO. 08-05722.

July 27, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 27th day of July, 2009, upon consideration of Petitioner Eric Cacho's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), the Respondents' Response in Opposition to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 9), the Petitioner's Reply (Doc. No. 10), Respondents' Sur-Reply (Doc. No. 11), the Report and Recommendation Filed by United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice (Doc. No. 12), the Petitioner's Objections (Doc. No. 14), and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Rice is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED;
3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability;
4. The Clerk of Court shall close the case.


Summaries of

Cacho v. Tennis

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 27, 2009
CIVIL ACTION, NO. 08-05722 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 27, 2009)
Case details for

Cacho v. Tennis

Case Details

Full title:ERIC CACHO, Petitioner, v. FRANKLIN J. TENNIS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 27, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION, NO. 08-05722 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 27, 2009)