From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caceres-Solari v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 7, 2020
2019-1693 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 7, 2020)

Opinion

2019-1693

02-07-2020

ANDRES CACERES-SOLARI, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee

WILLIAM CASSARA, Cassara Law Office, Evans, GA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. SONIA W. MURPHY, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JOSEPH H. HUNT, STEVEN JOHN GILLINGHAM, ROBERT EDWARD KIRSCHMAN, JR.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:18-cv-00539-EJD, Senior Judge Edward J. Damich.

JUDGMENT

WILLIAM CASSARA, Cassara Law Office, Evans, GA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. SONIA W. MURPHY, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JOSEPH H. HUNT, STEVEN JOHN GILLINGHAM, ROBERT EDWARD KIRSCHMAN, JR. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, O'MALLEY and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 7, 2020

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Caceres-Solari v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 7, 2020
2019-1693 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 7, 2020)
Case details for

Caceres-Solari v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ANDRES CACERES-SOLARI, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 7, 2020

Citations

2019-1693 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 7, 2020)