From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cabrera v. Rose Hill Asset Mgmt. Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 1, 2022
20 Civ. 2699 (AT) (JW) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 1, 2022)

Opinion

20 Civ. 2699 (AT) (JW)

06-01-2022

TENISLAO TORIBIO CABRERA, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. ROSE HILL ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION a/k/a RHAMCO, and BRUDAVA CORP., Defendants.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The parties are reminded that they may consent to proceed before the Honorable Jennifer Willis, who would then oversee the approval of the settlement. If the parties consent to Judge Willis' jurisdiction, by June 7, 2022, they shall file a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/node/754 on the docket. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences.

If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before Judge Willis rather than before the undersigned. An information sheet on proceedings before magistrate judges is also attached to this order. Any appeal would be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, as it would be if the consent form were not signed and so ordered.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cabrera v. Rose Hill Asset Mgmt. Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 1, 2022
20 Civ. 2699 (AT) (JW) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Cabrera v. Rose Hill Asset Mgmt. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:TENISLAO TORIBIO CABRERA, Individually and on behalf of all others…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 1, 2022

Citations

20 Civ. 2699 (AT) (JW) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 1, 2022)