Opinion
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency No. A76-224-424.
Walter Rafael Pineda, Esq., Law Offices of Walter Rafael Pineda, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.
Regional Counsel, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Mark C. Walters, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Stephen J. Flynn, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Benjamin Cabrera-Rivera, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals' affirmance without opinion pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(a)(7) of the Immigration Judge's denial of his application for asylum and withholding of deportation. Cabrera-Rivera's sole contention on appeal is that the BIA's decision without opinion fails to comport with due process requirements. This assertion is foreclosed by by this court's decision in Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 850-52 (9th Cir.2003).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.