From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cabral v. Wolf

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 30, 2009
22 Misc. 3d 131 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)

Summary

In Cabral, the court found the defense attorney's conclusory statements in an affirmation insufficient to establish a meritorious defense.

Summary of this case from Jormar Constr, Inc v. Tinawi

Opinion

January 30, 2009.


Judgments — Default Judgment.


Summaries of

Cabral v. Wolf

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 30, 2009
22 Misc. 3d 131 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)

In Cabral, the court found the defense attorney's conclusory statements in an affirmation insufficient to establish a meritorious defense.

Summary of this case from Jormar Constr, Inc v. Tinawi
Case details for

Cabral v. Wolf

Case Details

Full title:Cabral v. Wolf

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 30, 2009

Citations

22 Misc. 3d 131 (N.Y. App. Term 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 50164

Citing Cases

Jormar Constr, Inc v. Tinawi

It has also long been held that a meritorious defense must be substantiated by an affidavit of merit (…