From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cable v. Sexton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT GREENEVILLE
Jan 28, 2015
No.: 2:14-cv-332-JRG-DHI (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 28, 2015)

Opinion

No.: 2:14-cv-332-JRG-DHI

01-28-2015

JOHN FRANKLIN CABLE, Petitioner, v. DAVID SEXTON, Warden, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve copies of the petition and this Memorandum and Order upon the respondent and the Attorney General for The State of Tennessee. Since it does not plainly appear from the face of the petition that it should be summarily dismissed, the respondent is hereby ORDERED to answer or otherwise respond to the petition within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases In The United States District Courts. The respondent should specifically address whether the petition was timely filed and whether the petitioner has exhausted his available state court remedies. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(d), 2254(b).

ENTER:

s/ J. RONNIE GREER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cable v. Sexton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT GREENEVILLE
Jan 28, 2015
No.: 2:14-cv-332-JRG-DHI (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 28, 2015)
Case details for

Cable v. Sexton

Case Details

Full title:JOHN FRANKLIN CABLE, Petitioner, v. DAVID SEXTON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT GREENEVILLE

Date published: Jan 28, 2015

Citations

No.: 2:14-cv-332-JRG-DHI (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 28, 2015)