Opinion
No. CR-00-1688.
Decided March 1, 2002.
Appeal from Baldwin Circuit Court (CC-98-1801).
Thomas Edgar Dasinger, Daphne, for appellant.
Bill Pryor, atty. gen., and Joseph G.L. Marston III, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.
AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.
McMillan, P.J., and Baschab and Wise, JJ., concur. Cobb, J., concurs in the result, and concurs in part and dissents in part as to the rationale, with opinion.
I concur in the result reached by the majority in its unpublished memorandum. However, as to Issue I, I disagree with the rationale. Based on my review of the record, it appears that Karen Cabarrubia's objection identified with sufficient particularity the basis of her objection, and it appears that the trial court understood that she was alleging a lack of compliance with the statutory attestation requirements for admission of the document. Because the record was not subject to the requirements of the statute on which Cabarrubia relies, however, her claim on appeal must fail on the merits.