From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cabales v. Little League of Islips

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 5, 2002
292 A.D.2d 329 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2000-11824

Argued February 1, 2002.

March 5, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oshrin, J.), dated November 27, 2000, as granted those branches of the separate motions of the defendants Little League of the Islips, Inc., and Roy Rowsell, which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Marschhausen Fitzpatrick, P.C., Garden City, N.Y. (Kevin P. Fitzpatrick of counsel), for appellants.

Ahmuty, Demers McManus, Albertson, N.Y. (Frederick B. Simpson and Brendan T. Fitzpatrick of counsel), for respondent Little League of the Islips, Inc.

Lewis, Johs, Avallone, Aviles Kaufman, Melville, N.Y. (Ann K. Kandel and Michael G. Kruzynski of counsel), for respondent Roy Rowsell.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, LEO F. McGINITY, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The infant plaintiff, Meagan Cabales, was injured on property owned by the defendants Daniel Callery and Kathleen Callery during a party held to celebrate the success of her softball team. Meagan and her teammates were attempting to throw their coach, the defendant Scott Conover, into the pool when he allegedly caused her to fall on the cement pool edge. The infant plaintiff's father, Michael Cabales, commenced this action against Roy Rowsell, who managed the softball team and was a guest at the party, the Little League of the Islips, Inc. (hereinafter the Little League), Conover, Daniel Callery, who was also a member of the Board of Directors of the Little League, and Kathleen Callery. The Supreme Court properly granted the motions by Rowsell and the Little League for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

As a general rule, liability for a dangerous condition on property is predicated upon ownership, occupancy, control, or special use (see, Millman v. Citibank, 216 A.D.2d 278). Rowsell was merely a guest on the premises, and he was under no duty to the injured plaintiff to control the conduct of other guests on property he did not own (cf., D'Amico v. Christie, 71 N.Y.2d 76).

Liability may not be imposed on the Little League on the theory that codefendants, a manager, coach, and member of its Board of Directors, had apparent authority to act on its behalf. There is no evidence that the Little League, through its conduct, misled the plaintiffs as to the codefendants' authority to host the party on its behalf or as to its sponsorship of the party (see, Hallock v. State of New York, 64 N.Y.2d 224, 231; Ford v. Unity Hospital, 32 N.Y.2d 464, 472-473).

PRUDENTI, P.J., O'BRIEN, FRIEDMANN and McGINITY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cabales v. Little League of Islips

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 5, 2002
292 A.D.2d 329 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Cabales v. Little League of Islips

Case Details

Full title:MEAGAN CABALES, ETC., ET AL., appellants, v. LITTLE LEAGUE OF THE ISLIPS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 5, 2002

Citations

292 A.D.2d 329 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
738 N.Y.S.2d 83

Citing Cases

Lustenring v. 98-100 Realty

The plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact with regard to the ownership of or a duty to maintain…

Livichusca v. Mortgage

The appellant did not own the building at 3154 Fulton Street in 2001. Any duty of the appellant to maintain…