From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CABA v. U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division
Dec 27, 2010
CV 310-082 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 27, 2010)

Summary

holding petitioner's challenge to security classification did not state a cognizable ground for relief in a § 2241 petition

Summary of this case from Marte v. Gen. Counsel Fed. Bureau of Prisons

Opinion

CV 310-082.

December 27, 2010


ORDER


After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, the United States of America is DISMISSED from this case, the petition filed pursuant to § 2241 is DISMISSED, and this civil action is CLOSED.

SO ORDERED this 27th day of December, 2010, at Augusta, Georgia.


Summaries of

CABA v. U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division
Dec 27, 2010
CV 310-082 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 27, 2010)

holding petitioner's challenge to security classification did not state a cognizable ground for relief in a § 2241 petition

Summary of this case from Marte v. Gen. Counsel Fed. Bureau of Prisons
Case details for

CABA v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERTO CABA, Petitioner, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WALT WELLS…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division

Date published: Dec 27, 2010

Citations

CV 310-082 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 27, 2010)

Citing Cases

Marte v. Gen. Counsel Fed. Bureau of Prisons

Such allegations do not state cognizable grounds for relief in a § 2241 petition. See Caba v. United States,…

Kusyakov v. Stone

Respondent first asserts a § 2241 petition is not the proper vehicle for Petitioner's claims because they…