From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

C. W. Wright v. McAlister

Court of Appeals of Virginia. Argued at Alexandria, Virginia
May 2, 1995
Record No. 2134-94-4 (Va. Ct. App. May. 2, 1995)

Opinion

Record No. 2134-94-4

Decided: May 2, 1995

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION

Affirmed.

A. James Kauffman (G. Wythe Michael, Jr.; Taylor, Hazen Kauffman, on brief), for appellants.

John J. McGrath, Jr. (Janney, Janney McGrath, on brief), for appellee.

Present: Judges Baker, Bray and Fitzpatrick


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to Code Sec. 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.


C. W. Wright Construction Company, Inc. and Pacific Employers Insurance Company (together "employer") appeal the commission's finding that William E. McAlister (claimant) suffered from an occupational disease, carpal tunnel syndrome, and an award of attendant benefits. Employer contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the claim. We affirm the decision of the commission.

Although employer identifies several issues on appeal, we have considered them collectively in a sufficiency analysis.

The parties are fully conversant with the record in this case, and we recite only those facts necessary to explain our holding.

Under familiar principles, this Court will construe the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party below, claimant in this instance. Crisp v. Brown's Tysons Corner Dodge, Inc., 1 Va. App. 503, 504, 339 S.E.2d 916, 916 (1986). " 'Whether a disease is causally related to the employment and not causally related to other factors is . . . a finding of fact.' When there is credible evidence to support it, such a finding of fact [by the commission] is 'conclusive and binding' on this Court." Ross Laboratories v. Barbour, 13 Va. App. 373, 377-78, 412 S.E.2d 205, 208 (1991) (quoting Island Creek Coal Co. v. Breeding, 6 Va. App. 1, 12, 365 S.E.2d 782, 788 (1988)); Code Sec. 65.2-706(A).

On September 11, 1992, claimant first visited Dr. Jonathan K. Malone, the treating physician, complaining of "numbness and swelling" in his right hand. Dr. Malone noted in his records that claimant's symptoms were indicative of carpal tunnel syndrome and successfully performed "carpal tunnel release" surgery on November 13, 1993. In correspondence dated June 18, 1993, Dr. Malone associated carpal tunnel syndrome with "repetitive use of the hands and wrists," and, noting that claimant's work "required this type of repetitive use," concluded that he developed the condition "due to the nature of his job." In a later report, Dr. Malone described this pathology as "an occupational disease" caused by the "repetitive nature in which [claimant] used his hands."

This evidence, considered with the entire record, provided sufficient support to the commission's finding that claimant suffered a compensable, occupational disease. See Code Sec. 65.2-400(B); Piedmont Mfg. Co. v. East, 17 Va. App. 499, 503, 438 S.E.2d 769, 772 (1993); Dep't of State Police v. Haga, 18 Va. App. 162, 165-66, 442 S.E.2d 765, 425-26 (1994). Accordingly, we affirm the award.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

C. W. Wright v. McAlister

Court of Appeals of Virginia. Argued at Alexandria, Virginia
May 2, 1995
Record No. 2134-94-4 (Va. Ct. App. May. 2, 1995)
Case details for

C. W. Wright v. McAlister

Case Details

Full title:C. W. WRIGHT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. and PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE…

Court:Court of Appeals of Virginia. Argued at Alexandria, Virginia

Date published: May 2, 1995

Citations

Record No. 2134-94-4 (Va. Ct. App. May. 2, 1995)