C & K Consulting, LLC v. Ward Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs

4 Citing cases

  1. Lindberg v. Lindberg

    2024 N.D. 10 (N.D. 2024)   Cited 2 times

    Hanson's motion was filed within 28 days of the order denying his petition and thus tolled the time to appeal under N.D.R.App.P. 4(a)(3)(A)(iv) and (vi). C & K Consulting, LLC v. Ward Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs, 2020 ND 93, ¶ 13, 942 N.W.2d 823. Because Hanson's notice of appeal was filed within 60 days of service of the notice of entry of the order disposing of the motion, his appeal from both orders is timely.

  2. Gartei v. Gartei

    990 N.W.2d 586 (N.D. 2023)

    "Our review is limited to whether there is a sufficient justification for disturbing the finality of the judgment." C & K Consulting, LLC v. Ward Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs , 2020 ND 93, ¶ 16, 942 N.W.2d 823

  3. Gartei v. Gartei

    2023 N.D. 92 (N.D. 2023)

    C & K Consulting, LLC v. Ward Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs, 2020 ND 93, ¶ 16, 942 N.W.2d 823. "We review the court's decision for an abuse of discretion." Id.

  4. Schmitz v. N. Dakota State Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners

    2022 N.D. 113 (N.D. 2022)   Cited 2 times

    Lewis v. N.D. Workers Comp. Bureau, 2000 ND 77, ¶¶ 11, 13-14, 609 N.W.2d 445; see alsoFriends of Duane Sand-2012 v. Job Serv. N.D., 2016 ND 38, ¶ 6, 876 N.W.2d 433. But see C & K Consulting, LLC v. Ward Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs, 2020 ND 93, ¶ 11, 942 N.W.2d 823 (holding the rationale of Lewis and Friends of Duane Sand did not apply because of limited statutory framework for appeals from local governing bodies).