Summary
noting further that the “intended purpose of Congress in enacting the trust provision of PACA was to provide unpaid produce sellers who had delivered commodities with greater protection from risk of default by buyers, by placing them ahead of other creditors in priority”
Summary of this case from Derek & Matthew Bissett Farms, Brantley Farms, Inc. v. Bissett Produce, Inc. (In re Bissett Produce, Inc.)Opinion
Case No. 1:09-CV-0032-LJO-SKO.
January 20, 2011
Paul W. Moncrief, Esq. SBN 204239, Paul Hart, Esq. SBN 237766, JOHNSON MONCRIEF, PLC, Salinas, CA, Attorney for Plaintiffs, C G Farms, Inc. and George Amaral Ranches, Inc.
Pursuant to Local Rule 141, Plaintiff George Amaral Ranches, Inc. ("Plaintiff") has applied to this Court for an order permitting it to file under seal Exhibit 14, Exhibit 15, and Exhibit 19 in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment or, alternatively, Motion for Summary Adjudication pursuant to Local Rule 141.
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Plaintiff's request is granted. The Clerk is directed to maintain the following Exhibits in accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 141:
Exhibit 14, Exhibit 15, and Exhibit 19 in Support of Plaintiff George Amaral Ranches, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment, or Alternatively, Summary Adjudication.
Dated: January 20, 2011