Opinion
Submitted June 6, 1924 —
Decided October 20, 1924.
On appeal from the Supreme Court.
For the appellant, S.C. Garrison.
For the respondent, Philip Goodell.
Neither after consideration of the facts, nor of the law involved in this case, are we disposed to disturb the judgment appealed from; for, as was sagely remarked by Lord Coke, "ubi eadem ratio ibi idem jus." Co. Litt. 10 a; Ippollito v. Ridgefield, 94 N.J.L. 97; Headley v. Cavelier, 82 N.J.L. 637; Jersey City Supply Co. v. Jersey City, 71 Id. 631; Ocean City v. Shriver, 64 Id. 550.
The judgment will therefore be affirmed.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 16.
For reversal — None.