From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byrom v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Dec 1, 1937
110 S.W.2d 916 (Tex. Crim. App. 1937)

Opinion

No. 19221.

Delivered December 1, 1937.

New Trial — Evidence.

Where indictment appeared regular, there was no statement of facts or bills of exception in the record, in absence of evidence adduced upon trial appellate court was unable to appraise matters presented in motion for new trial, judgment was affirmed.

Appeal from the District Court of Archer County. Hon. Allan D. Montgomery, Judge.

Appeal from conviction for robbery; penalty, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

Affirmed.

The opinion states the case.

Mike Anglin, of Wichita Falls, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


The offense is robbery; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The indictment appears regular and regularly presented. The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. In the absence of the evidence adduced upon the trial, this court is unable to appraise the matters presented in the motion for new trial.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Byrom v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Dec 1, 1937
110 S.W.2d 916 (Tex. Crim. App. 1937)
Case details for

Byrom v. State

Case Details

Full title:W. C. BYROM v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Dec 1, 1937

Citations

110 S.W.2d 916 (Tex. Crim. App. 1937)
110 S.W.2d 916