Opinion
Argued December 22, 1880
Decided January 18, 1881
R.A. Parmenter for appellant.
Esek Cowen for respondent.
EARL, J., reads for reversal and new trial.
All concur, except FOLGER, Ch. J., and RAPALLO, J., who dissent.
Judgment reversed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Byrne v. the New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 18, 1881
83 N.Y. 620 (N.Y. 1881)
Summaries of
Byrne v. the New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 18, 1881
83 N.Y. 620 (N.Y. 1881)
Case details for
Byrne v. the New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.
Case Details
Full title:MARY BYRNE, an Infant, etc., Appellant, v . THE NEW YORK CENTRAL AND…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jan 18, 1881
Citations
83 N.Y. 620 (N.Y. 1881)
Citing Cases
Zwack v. N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co.
An infant, to avoid the imputation of negligence, is bound only to exercise that degree of care which can…
West v. Metropolitan Street R. Co.While it may be that in the case of a child ten years of age the question as to whether or not he is sui…