From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byrne v. Gen. Elec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 3, 2011
CIVIL ACTION No. 10-7369 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 3, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 10-7369

08-03-2011

MATTHEW BYRNE and JESSICA BYRNE on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC, Defendant.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2011, upon consideration of Defendant General Electric's Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs' Opposition thereto, Defendant's reply thereon, and for the reasons stated in this Court's Memorandum dated August 3, 2011 it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's motion (Document No. 18) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows:

1. Defendant's motion is DENIED with respect to Count I and Count V of Plaintiffs' Complaint.
2. Defendant's motion is otherwise GRANTED: Count II, Count III, Count IV and Count VI of Plaintiffs' Complaint are DISMISSED.
3. The parties may commence discovery on Plaintiffs' remaining claims; any such discovery shall be completed by November 30, 2011.
4. Any motions for summary judgment shall be filed by December 9, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Berle M. Schiller, J


Summaries of

Byrne v. Gen. Elec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 3, 2011
CIVIL ACTION No. 10-7369 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Byrne v. Gen. Elec.

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW BYRNE and JESSICA BYRNE on behalf of themselves and all others…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 3, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 10-7369 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 3, 2011)

Citing Cases

Supplee-Wills-Jones Milk Co. v. Southern Pennsylvania Traction Co.

Appellant is entitled to all favorable inferences which the jury might draw from the evidence. There was…