From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byrd v. Tompkins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Sep 14, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-504 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 14, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-504

09-14-2018

FRANK EDWARD BYRD, III, Plaintiff, v. AARON TOMPKINS, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Frank Edward Byrd, Jr., an inmate confined at the Hughes Unit, proceeding pro se, brought this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief (docket entry no. 12) should be denied.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. It is

ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief is DENIED.

SIGNED at Plano, Texas, this 14th day of September, 2018.

/s/_________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Byrd v. Tompkins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Sep 14, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-504 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 14, 2018)
Case details for

Byrd v. Tompkins

Case Details

Full title:FRANK EDWARD BYRD, III, Plaintiff, v. AARON TOMPKINS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Date published: Sep 14, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-504 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 14, 2018)