From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byrd v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 12, 2019
263 So. 3d 1137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

No. 1D18-5262

02-12-2019

Veniko Marquel BYRD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Veniko Marquel Byrd, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Veniko Marquel Byrd, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied on the merits.

Bilbrey, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

Byrd v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 12, 2019
263 So. 3d 1137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Byrd v. State

Case Details

Full title:VENIKO MARQUEL BYRD, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Feb 12, 2019

Citations

263 So. 3d 1137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)