From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byrd v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 2, 1997
695 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 97-553

Opinion filed July 2, 1997.

An appeal from the Circuit Court of Duval County. Brad Stetson, Judge.

Appellant Pro Se.

No Appearance for Appellee.


Michael Byrd, the defendant, appeals the trial court's order summarily denying his postconviction motion under rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The order recites that the defendant's claims are conclusively refuted by attached portions of the record, but the portions of the record to which the court referred were not attached. Because the defendant has asserted a facially sufficient claim, the trial court erred in summarily denying the motion. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850(d). We reverse and remand this cause to the trial court for attachment of those portions of the record that conclusively refute appellant's claims or an evidentiary hearing. Hall v. State, 603 So.2d 650 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Wells v. State, 598 So.2d 259 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992);Oehling v. State, 659 So.2d 1226 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

Reversed and remanded.

WEBSTER, MICKLE and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Byrd v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 2, 1997
695 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Byrd v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BYRD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jul 2, 1997

Citations

695 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Harris v. State

We reverse the order summarily denying relief and remand for the trial court to attach portions of the record…