From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byrd v. Plano Police Dep't

United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas
Jul 31, 2021
Civil Action 4:21-CV-111 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 31, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 4:21-CV-111

07-31-2021

NOLAND ROOSEVELT BYRD, #21014688 v. PLANO POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL.


Nowak, Judge

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

RICHARD A. SCHELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On June 7, 2021, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #23) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that pro se Petitioner Noland Roosevelt Byrd's civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the court.

It is therefore ORDERED that pro se Petitioner Noland Roosevelt Byrd's civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Byrd v. Plano Police Dep't

United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas
Jul 31, 2021
Civil Action 4:21-CV-111 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 31, 2021)
Case details for

Byrd v. Plano Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:NOLAND ROOSEVELT BYRD, #21014688 v. PLANO POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas

Date published: Jul 31, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 4:21-CV-111 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 31, 2021)

Citing Cases

Bey v. Nowak

The court ordered the plaintiff to provide evidence that he had in fact changed his name by some legal means.…

Bey v. Delgado

Jail Mailroom Officers, No. 3:14-cv-3006 (N.D. Tex.) (case dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(b));…