From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byrd v. Franklin Cnty.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Apr 9, 2015
771 S.E.2d 293 (N.C. 2015)

Opinion

No. 462A14.

04-09-2015

Aaron BYRD and Eric Coombs v. FRANKLIN COUNTY, North Carolina.

Robin Tatum Currin, George B. Currin, Raleigh, for Byrd, Aaron, et al. Aubrey S. Tomlinson, Jr., Louisburg, for Franklin County (NC).


Robin Tatum Currin, George B. Currin, Raleigh, for Byrd, Aaron, et al.Aubrey S. Tomlinson, Jr., Louisburg, for Franklin County (NC).

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Respondent on the 2nd of January 2015 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A–31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

“Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of April 2015.”

Accordingly, only those issues which are the basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals shall be presented to this Court in briefs. The Defendant's new brief so limited in scope shall be filed with this Court not more than 30 days from the date of certification of this order.


Summaries of

Byrd v. Franklin Cnty.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Apr 9, 2015
771 S.E.2d 293 (N.C. 2015)
Case details for

Byrd v. Franklin Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:Aaron BYRD and Eric Coombs v. FRANKLIN COUNTY, North Carolina.

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Apr 9, 2015

Citations

771 S.E.2d 293 (N.C. 2015)