From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byrd v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 3, 2010
381 F. App'x 266 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-7878.

Submitted: May 17, 2010.

Decided: June 3, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (2:08-cv-03540-TLW).

Steven Allen Byrd, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Steven Byrd appeals the district court's order accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to grant Defendants summary judgment on Byrd's claims, which the magistrate judge construed as being filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknovm Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Byrd v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 2:08-cv-03540-TLW, 2009 WL 3157325 (D.S.C. Sept. 25, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Byrd v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 3, 2010
381 F. App'x 266 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Byrd v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Case Details

Full title:Steven Allen BYRD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 3, 2010

Citations

381 F. App'x 266 (4th Cir. 2010)