Opinion
9166-21S
01-14-2022
ORDER
Maurice B. Foley, Chief Judge
On January 13, 2022, respondent filed an Answer to the petition (Entry No. 8). On January 13, 2022, respondent electronically filed an Answer to Amended Petition (Entry No. 9) which is essentially duplicative of the first answer, except it (Entry No. 9) is correctly titled as an answer to amended petition. The foregoing considered, it is
ORDERED that respondent's Answer (Entry No. 8) filed January 13, 2022, is hereby deemed stricken from the record in this case.