From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bynum v. U.S. Capitol Police Board

United States District Court, D. Columbia
May 11, 2000
96 F. Supp. 2d 4 (D.D.C. 2000)

Opinion

No. CIV.A. 97-1337 (PLF).

May 11, 2000.


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff's motion for relief pursuant to Rules 59 and 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and defendants' cross-motion for reconsideration or, in the alternative, for clarification. Plaintiffs motion requests that the Court amend its March 31, 2000 Order and Judgment in this case to eliminate the final paragraph dismissing the case with prejudice. Defendant's cross-motion does not contest this amendment, but instead requests that the Court amend its Order and Judgment to approve the recent amendments to the Capitol Police's regulations. Upon consideration of the parties' motions, it is hereby

ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for relief pursuant to Rules 59 and 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is GRANTED. The final ordering paragraph of the Court's March 31, 2000 Order and Judgment was included as a result of a clerical error; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' cross-motion for reconsideration or, in the alternative, for clarification is DENIED. The Capitol Police's amended regulation is not before the Court; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court's March 31, 2000 Order and Judgment is VACATED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall file the Amended Order and Judgment issued this same day.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bynum v. U.S. Capitol Police Board

United States District Court, D. Columbia
May 11, 2000
96 F. Supp. 2d 4 (D.D.C. 2000)
Case details for

Bynum v. U.S. Capitol Police Board

Case Details

Full title:Reverend Pierre BYNUM, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE BOARD…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: May 11, 2000

Citations

96 F. Supp. 2d 4 (D.D.C. 2000)