From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bynum v. Spencer

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 26, 2021
No. 20-7239 (4th Cir. Feb. 26, 2021)

Opinion

No. 20-7239

02-26-2021

OLANDER R. BYNUM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TIMOTHY K. SPENCER, Defendant - Appellee.

Olander R. Bynum, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:19-ct-03322-FL) Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Olander R. Bynum, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Olander R. Bynum appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as duplicative and, therefore, frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Bynum's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) ("The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief."). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Bynum v. Spencer

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 26, 2021
No. 20-7239 (4th Cir. Feb. 26, 2021)
Case details for

Bynum v. Spencer

Case Details

Full title:OLANDER R. BYNUM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TIMOTHY K. SPENCER, Defendant…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 26, 2021

Citations

No. 20-7239 (4th Cir. Feb. 26, 2021)