Opinion
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02916-WYD
03-05-2012
Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel
ORDER
The matter before me is the "Applicant's Reply to Respondent's [sic] Response to Motion Requesting Clarification of Court Order," Doc. No. 53. In the Reply, Applicant asks permission to reply to Respondents' February 8, 2012 Response to Motion, Doc. No. 46. The request is denied. As nothing precludes me from ruling on a motion at any time after it is filed, see D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.I.C., I ruled on Applicant's Motion Requesting Clarification on February 17, 2012. Even if I consider Applicant's Reply, nothing supports a reversal of my findings in the February 17 Order that denied Applicant's third motion to reconsider the April 29, 2011 Order. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Applicant's request, Doc. No. 53, for permission to reply to Respondents' Response is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
___________________________
Wiley Y. Daniel
Chief United States District Judge