From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bynum v. Hancock

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 2, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00064-BNB (D. Colo. Mar. 2, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00064-BNB

03-02-2012

CECIL BYNUM, Plaintiff, v. MAYOR MICHAEL HANCOCK, Municipality, City and County of Denver, KERI JOHNSON, DAVID RYAN, AP RICHMOND, J CASIAS, J ANDREWS, J SIMMONS, and ROBERT HART, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND

On March 1, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Motion Requesting Modification of Court Ordered Payments. Monthly filing fee payments are provided for under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). Plaintiff is responsible for arranging for payments. A filing fee payment is not a restitution payment. Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Modification, Doc. No. 10, is DENIED.


Summaries of

Bynum v. Hancock

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 2, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00064-BNB (D. Colo. Mar. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Bynum v. Hancock

Case Details

Full title:CECIL BYNUM, Plaintiff, v. MAYOR MICHAEL HANCOCK, Municipality, City and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Mar 2, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00064-BNB (D. Colo. Mar. 2, 2012)