From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bynum v. Frito Lay Transp.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 10, 2024
3:24-cv-148-DPM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 10, 2024)

Opinion

3:24-cv-148-DPM

12-10-2024

AVERY BYNUM, PLAINTIFF v. FRITO LAY TRANSPORTATION and PEPSICO, DEFENDANTS


ORDER

D.P. MARSHALL JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Bynum hasn't paid the filing fee, and the time to do so has passed. Doc. 6. His complaint will therefore be dismissed without prejudice. LOCAL RULE 5.5(C)(2). An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Bynum v. Frito Lay Transp.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 10, 2024
3:24-cv-148-DPM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 10, 2024)
Case details for

Bynum v. Frito Lay Transp.

Case Details

Full title:AVERY BYNUM, PLAINTIFF v. FRITO LAY TRANSPORTATION and PEPSICO, DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Dec 10, 2024

Citations

3:24-cv-148-DPM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 10, 2024)