From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bynoe v. Russell

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 22, 2023
3:07-cv-00009-LRH-CLB (D. Nev. Feb. 22, 2023)

Opinion

3:07-cv-00009-LRH-CLB

02-22-2023

MICHAEL BRUCE BYNOE, Petitioner, v. PERRY RUSSELL, WARDEN, et al., Respondents.


ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING TO MARCH 14, 2023 (ECF NO. 125)

LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Respondents seek an extension of time to respond to § 2254 habeas corpus petitioner Michael Bruce Bynoe's motion for evidentiary hearing. (ECF No. 125.) Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that respondents' unopposed first motion for extension of time to file a response to the motion for evidentiary hearing (ECF No. 125) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. The deadline to respond is extended to March 14, 2023.


Summaries of

Bynoe v. Russell

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 22, 2023
3:07-cv-00009-LRH-CLB (D. Nev. Feb. 22, 2023)
Case details for

Bynoe v. Russell

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BRUCE BYNOE, Petitioner, v. PERRY RUSSELL, WARDEN, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 22, 2023

Citations

3:07-cv-00009-LRH-CLB (D. Nev. Feb. 22, 2023)